Indonesian Aquaculture 2025: A Comprehensive Investment Guide for Sustainable High-Value Farming

Chapter 1: The High-Value Landscape and Strategic Regional Opportunities

1.1 Indonesia’s Position in Global Aquaculture (2025 Outlook)

The Indonesian fisheries sector is globally recognized as a powerhouse, with aquaculture serving as the primary engine of growth, contributing 66.87% of the industry’s total production volume, significantly outperforming capture fisheries.1 Indonesia operates within the dynamic Asia-Pacific region, which accounts for over 90% of global aquaculture output, and the market here is predicted to expand robustly by more than five percent annually from 2025 through 2030.2 This growth aligns with the national strategic vision, articulated by the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (KKP), to elevate aquaculture into the prime mover for domestic fish supply and align development with the “Blue Economy” concept, focusing on sustainability and increased output.3 To realize this ambition, foreign direct investment (FDI) is actively sought to finance crucial infrastructure upgrades and develop advanced technological capabilities.2

While the fundamental market position remains strong—Indonesian shrimp exports showed a remarkable 26% year-to-date value increase through May 2025, buoyed by strategic shipment acceleration 6—the sector currently faces significant short-term volatility. The recent imposition of a 19% anti-dumping tariff by the United States on Indonesian shrimp has created ripples, potentially cutting overall exports by up to 30%.7 This structural challenge is compelling Indonesian producers to rapidly diversify market exposure. Exporters are now strategically targeting high-growth alternatives, including China, the Middle East, and the European Union.7

This necessary shift is amplified by the ongoing negotiations for a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the European Union, which, if secured by 2026, is expected to catalyze a major surge in demand for high-value, sustainably sourced seafood.7 This external pressure—the tariff disruption—acts as an powerful incentive, accelerating the adoption of advanced, traceable technology (such as Recirculation Aquaculture Systems or Biofloc) and driving investment toward sophisticated, value-added processing infrastructure, a sector already attracting the largest investment share ($232 million).3 For sophisticated investors, aligning with sustainability is not merely a cost of compliance but a critical competitive advantage, unlocking access to preferred international financing (often supported by partners like the World Bank and Dutch consortia) 4 and securing entry into premium, high-standard markets like the EU.7 Long-term financial viability is therefore directly correlated with adherence to advanced, climate-smart growth strategies.10

1.2 High-Value Species Focus: Market Potential and Sustainability Profiles

Investment in Indonesian aquaculture should prioritize species that combine strong export potential with suitability for sustainable, intensive farming techniques.

Vannamei Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei): Vannamei remains the cornerstone of Indonesian exports, contributing approximately 80% of total shrimp production.1 It offers significant economic potential as a leading export commodity, with attractive potential profit margins starting from 30% per cycle under optimal management conditions.11 However, this species is highly susceptible to devastating disease outbreaks, notably White Spot Syndrome Virus (WSSV) and Enterocytozoon Hepatopenaei (EHP/HPM), which farmers frequently cite as their primary concern.12

Premium Finfish (Grouper): Grouper represents a rapidly expanding segment of the global premium seafood market. The global Grouper market size was valued at USD 518.22 million in 2024 and is projected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 3.92% through 2033.14 Over 50% of the total global supply now originates from aquaculture, driven by high demand in high-end restaurants and growing e-commerce seafood platforms.14 Investment opportunities focus on integrating advanced breeding, feed formulation, and production systems to meet the exacting quality demands of this premium market segment.2

High-Yield Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): Indonesia is currently the world’s second-largest tilapia producer, with an annual output of 1.4 million tonnes, and has set an ambitious target to reach 2 million tonnes by 2029.5 Tilapia is resilient, versatile, and fast-growing, thriving in various environments.5 While traditionally consumed domestically (it is profitable for low-cost markets using Biofloc) 15, advanced farming techniques and superior strains have positioned export-grade Tilapia as a major opportunity, supported by government infrastructure revitalization programs.5

Emerging Marine Commodities: The KKP actively promotes investment in strategic commodities such as Seaweed (with centers like Wakatobi and Rote Island targeted) and Lobster (focused around Mataram and Lombok).8 A specific opportunity exists in developing the capacity to culture lobster fry to juvenile size, creating reliable, quality stock necessary for large-scale grow-out operations.3

1.3 Regional Risk and Opportunity Mapping (Infrastructure, Logistics, and Policy)

The optimal location for an aquaculture project is determined by balancing infrastructure density and logistics against environmental quality and biosecurity risk.

Established Clusters (Java, Lampung, NTB):

Provinces such as South Lampung, Cirebon (West Java), Situbondo (East Java), Jembrana (Bali), and Lombok (West Nusa Tenggara) 16 represent established aquaculture hubs. These regions offer mature logistics chains, established processing facilities, and lower average shipping costs.17 However, the drawback is significant land competition, higher input prices, and a heightened biosecurity risk stemming from decades of dense, intensive farming practices.18

Emerging Frontiers (Sulawesi, Eastern Indonesia):

Eastern regions, including Central Sulawesi—which saw $7.2 billion in Foreign Direct Investment realization in 2023, driven by industrial park expansion 20—and targeted areas like Maluku and Wakatobi, offer cleaner coastal ecosystems.9 These areas are favored by national policy and international development programs (like those supported by the World Bank) specifically aimed at sustainable development and local welfare improvement.9 The investment risk in these frontiers shifts away from environmental degradation and toward operational logistics. The primary constraint here is the high cost of shipping and the lack of direct export flights, which diminishes the competitiveness of fragile or high-volume, time-sensitive products.21

The contrast between the two regions creates a critical strategic choice for investors. Investing in the competitive Western clusters (Java/Lampung) offers logistical ease but demands superior biosecurity infrastructure (RAS/Biofloc) to manage the high ambient pathogen load accumulated from intensive farming history.16 Failing to implement advanced risk mitigation measures in these historical hotspots severely jeopardizes profitability.22 Conversely, while Eastern Indonesia offers greater alignment with current sustainability policies and cleaner environments 9, investors must plan to integrate logistics solutions or focus on species and products (such as frozen or highly processed goods) that can absorb the relatively higher costs of inter-island and international shipment.21

Table 1.1 provides a summarized matrix for regional investment assessment:

Table 1.1: Regional Aquaculture Investment Risk Matrix (2025)

1.4 Investment Advice: Strategic Regional Selection

What to Do: Foreign investors should prioritize regions where the provincial and regional spatial plans (Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah, RTRW) explicitly allocate coastal areas for aquaculture. This alignment is essential for streamlining the acquisition of the Izin Lokasi Perairan (Aquatic Location Permit).23 For projects demanding a swift return on investment through high volume, focus should remain on the Western clusters (Java, Lampung), but only when coupled with a guaranteed budget for sophisticated, closed-loop biosecurity systems (RAS or advanced Biofloc). For investors targeting long-term sustainable growth, international development financing, and premium market access (such as the EU FTA), exploring Eastern Indonesia is recommended, but planning must include robust, integrated logistics or on-site processing capabilities to mitigate high shipping costs.9

What to Be Cautious About: It is hazardous to base investment decisions solely on cheap land or low initial operational expenses. Rigorous due diligence is mandatory, focusing on the local environmental history, specifically persistent disease outbreaks in neighboring farms, and compliance with coastal regulation. The systemic challenges of land use conflict and opacity in concession processes remain significant economic, social, and environmental costs in Indonesia.24

Chapter 2: Sustainable Aquaculture Technologies: Optimizing Profitability and Input Use

2.1 Technology Selection Framework: High-Intensity vs. Controlled Systems

To compete in high-value export markets, producers must transition decisively away from traditional farming methods, which are characterized by high Feed Conversion Ratios (FCRs) and precarious profit margins.25 The strategic selection of technology must focus on controlled, resource-efficient systems. The choice between technology types hinges directly on the target species, the quantum of available capital, and the desired level of biosecurity control over the culture environment.

2.2 Recirculation Aquaculture Systems (RAS): High Biosecurity, High CAPEX

Recirculation Aquaculture Systems (RAS) represent the pinnacle of controlled environment farming. These systems are engineered to recycle 90% or more of the water content, continuously maintaining optimal quality and stability.26 This capacity directly addresses the most common constraint cited by traditional Indonesian farmers: “Poor water quality,” which affects 95.83% of surveyed operations.19

RAS technology is ideally suited for cultivating high-value, premium species such as Grouper or export-grade Tilapia, where environmental stability maximizes growth performance and minimizes catastrophic losses from disease. Successful examples of foreign investment, such as the establishment of RAS facilities for Catfish and Pangasius in West and East Java, underscore the proven feasibility of integrating this technology into the Indonesian context.4

However, RAS entails substantial upfront capital expenditure (CAPEX) and requires continuous, high energy input for the essential operation of pumps, filters, and aeration systems.15 Operational sustainability is highly sensitive to power costs. A critical mitigation strategy involves the integration of solar energy generation with battery storage solutions. This pairing ensures an uninterruptible power supply, mitigates potential disruptions, and substantially enhances long-term profitability by stabilizing and reducing utility expenses.26

2.3 Biofloc Technology (BFT): Lower Cost, Efficient Nutrient Cycling

Biofloc Technology (BFT) offers a more accessible, resource-efficient, and profitable intermediate solution. BFT relies on the active cultivation of microbial communities (flocs) that efficiently recycle organic waste and nutrients within the pond system, providing supplementary protein for the cultured species while reducing nitrogen excretion.26 Notably, BFT systems can operate using up to 90% less water than traditional methods, making them ideal for water-scarce regions or small-scale intensive operations.15

BFT is significantly more cost-effective than large-scale RAS, with comparable CAPEX estimates ranging from INR 1.5–15 lakhs, sometimes representing as little as one-twentieth the cost of highly sophisticated RAS installations.15 BFT is highly profitable for cultivating resilient, high-volume species like Tilapia, offering superior profit margins over traditional farming methods primarily through markedly reduced feed consumption (lower FCR).25

To maximize performance and mitigate risk in BFT, the adoption of smart technology is indispensable. Integrating Internet of Things (IoT) sensors and Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms allows for real-time monitoring of crucial parameters, such as floc density and dissolved oxygen.28 This proactive digital management enhances survival rates, reduces FCR, and provides early warnings, turning the operational challenge of managing complex water chemistry into a predictable, efficient system.28

Table 2.1 provides a technical and financial comparison of the two leading high-intensity technologies:

Table 2.1: Comparison of High-Intensity Aquaculture Technologies

2.4 Critical Input Supply Chain Assessment

A detailed evaluation of the input supply chain reveals significant constraints that directly impede profitability. The cost of feed is the largest operational factor, cited as a high-cost constraint by 83.33% of farmers.19 The reliance on imported fish meal drives this high cost, primarily due to the elevated domestic price of trash fish, the raw material, which can cost up to $2.06 per kilogram to process into meal.29 Furthermore, government initiatives aimed at mitigating these costs, such as the “Self-Sufficiency Fish Feed Program,” have failed to deliver positive business performance impacts because the quality of the resulting feed is often poor, leading to unexpectedly higher production costs and detrimental FCRs compared to farms operating outside the program.30

This systemic inadequacy in the local, conventional supply chain demonstrates that investors cannot rely on external, low-cost feed sources for the performance required by intensive systems. The necessary strategy involves vertical integration—or formation of highly monitored supply partnerships—to secure inputs. This includes investing in local high-quality feed formulation, potentially substituting reliance on trash fish 29 with superior, sustainable alternatives.

Alternative proteins, particularly Black Soldier Fly (BSF) insect meal, represent a superior and sustainable solution, leveraging the BSF’s capacity to convert Indonesia’s substantial daily organic waste (over 40,000 tons) into high-nutritional-value protein and fat.31 However, despite BSF’s massive potential market size (estimated at $460 billion) 31, the industry has struggled to achieve competitive pricing against conventional fish and soybean meals.31 This specific cost challenge represents a significant upstream investment opportunity: foreign capital and technology, potentially utilizing AI/IoT for optimization 28, could be instrumental in scaling BSF production to break the price barrier, transforming a major operational cost constraint into a highly profitable, sustainable upstream business.

In addition to feed, securing high-quality juvenile stock, or ‘seed,’ is paramount. Poor seed quality is a common vector for pathogen introduction and inevitably leads to slow growth and high susceptibility to disease, fundamentally defining the performance of the entire culture system.18 Ensuring access to certified, pathogen-free Post-Larvae (PL) and broodstock is a non-negotiable prerequisite for biosecurity and farm success.34

2.5 Investment Advice: Technology Choice and Input Security

What to Do: Detailed financial modeling must be conducted that rigorously compares the cost savings derived from FCR reduction in BFT or RAS against the increased capital and energy expenditures required.25 For premium, export-grade finfish, the adoption of RAS is recommended, but only if paired with a guaranteed, uninterrupted renewable energy source, such as solar power with battery storage, to manage high electricity demand.26 Investment priority must be given to securing high-quality, certified seed/PL, even if the initial procurement cost is higher, as this decision is the most effective way to mitigate catastrophic disease risk and ensure optimal biological performance.18

What to Be Cautious About: Do not overlook or underestimate the consistent, high electrical requirements of intensive systems; power consumption is directly proportional to the intensification level and can pose a significant financial risk if unstable.27 Crucially, attempting to cut operational costs by relying on uncertified or low-quality local feed, particularly in light of the documented failures of state-led feed programs 30, will inevitably lead to higher FCR, stunted growth, and a reduction in overall project profitability, thereby negating the competitive advantage gained from high-tech infrastructure.

Chapter 3: Navigating the Regulatory Framework and Ownership Rights

3.1 Establishing the Foreign Investment Vehicle (PT PMA)

Foreign entities intending to undertake aquaculture projects in Indonesia must establish a Foreign-Owned Limited Liability Company, known as a PT PMA (Perseroan Terbatas Penanaman Modal Asing).35 This structure provides the necessary legal framework to operate in various sectors, including agriculture and aquaculture.

Significant reforms introduced under Minister of Investment Regulation No. 5 of 2025 have streamlined market entry while maintaining the commitment to attracting large-scale investment.36 Under this regulation, the minimum total investment plan for a foreign entity must remain at IDR 10 Billion (approximately USD 640,000) per business activity (KBLI).36 However, the immediate cash burden has been significantly lowered: the required minimum paid-up capital has been reduced from IDR 10 Billion to only IDR 2.5 Billion (approximately USD 160,000).36 The remaining IDR 7.5 Billion may consist of qualifying non-cash assets and expenditures, including essential project investments such as machinery, equipment, feasibility studies, construction costs, and critically for aquaculture, the cost of land and buildings.37

This regulatory structure explicitly favors investors committed to large, physical infrastructure. By allowing land and construction costs to count toward the minimum IDR 10 Billion threshold, the government incentivizes tangible, fixed-asset development like large-scale RAS or processing facilities, directly aligning the FDI requirements with national goals for high-standard production capacity.1 While market entry has been simplified, the same regulation simultaneously introduces stricter compliance expectations. The new framework emphasizes proactive management, requiring mandatory quarterly Investment Activity Reports (LKPM) and allowing for the quicker deactivation of inactive accounts.38 This shift necessitates robust internal controls and strong local advisory support to ensure continuous compliance.39

3.2 Licensing and Permits via the Online Single Submission (OSS) System

Indonesia’s business licensing is managed through the Online Single Submission (OSS) system, which operates under a risk-based framework (Perizinan Berusaha Berbasis Risiko, PBBR).38 The process involves obtaining three principal licenses:

1. Business Identity Number (Nomor Induk Berusaha, NIB): This is the foundational registration obtained upon entry into the OSS system. The NIB simultaneously functions as the Company Registration Certificate, the Importer Identification Number, and the customs access right, remaining valid for the life of the business.40
2. Business License (Izin Usaha): Granted after the company fulfills specific commitments listed in the OSS system.40
3. Aquatic Location Permit (Izin Lokasi Perairan): For aquaculture, this permit is critical. It must be secured from the Director General of Aquaculture (part of KKP) prior to obtaining the main fisheries business license. This permit confirms the project’s compliance with marine and coastal spatial planning regulations.23

3.3 Land Tenure and Spatial Planning for Aquaculture Projects

Foreign investors operating through a PT PMA are restricted from holding Freehold land rights (Hak Milik). However, the PMA structure grants access to several long-term land titles essential for large-scale aquaculture infrastructure:

• Right to Build (Hak Guna Bangunan, HGB): This title allows the PMA to construct and own buildings and fixed infrastructure on state or private land, with a validity period of up to 80 years (through initial grant, extension, and renewal).42 HGB is the standard title for hatcheries, processing plants, and intensive indoor facilities.
• Right to Cultivate (Hak Guna Usaha, HGU): This title is granted for large-scale agricultural and aquaculture cultivation activities, typically with an initial tenure of 25 to 35 years and renewal options.
• Water Location Concessions: While historical coastal water concession mechanisms (Hak Pengusahaan Perairan Pesisir, HP-3) were annulled in 2011 due to constitutional concerns regarding traditional community rights 41, the need for government approval remains. Any coastal or marine aquaculture project must still secure the Izin Lokasi Perairan to ensure the project does not conflict with local spatial and community interests.23

The legal framework concerning land tenure and concessions remains subject to conflict and opacity, particularly involving overlapping claims and customary law (Adat).24 Therefore, rigorous due diligence is paramount.

3.4 Investment Incentives and Taxation

The Indonesian government offers attractive income tax facilities designed to spur major investment in the fisheries and marine sector.43 Investors may qualify for these incentives by investing in specific business sectors (such as freezing and processing industries) and/or by investing in designated regions.

Key incentives include:

• Net Income Deduction: Investors can receive a deduction in net income equivalent to 30% of the total investment value. This is charged at 5% per year for six years, applied to intangible assets, which include land use rights.43
• Dividend Tax Reduction: Income tax on dividends can be reduced to a flat rate of 10%, with potential for further reduction depending on applicable Double Tax Avoidance Agreements between Indonesia and the investor’s home country.43

To obtain these facilities, projects typically must meet high thresholds, such as an investment value exceeding IDR 75 billion (USD $4.8 million) AND meet operational criteria, including exporting at least 50% of the products or employing a minimum of 100 people (with 90% being Indonesian citizens).43

3.5 Investment Advice: Legal and Compliance Strategy

What to Do: Foreign investors must immediately secure expert legal counsel to navigate the revised IDR 10B minimum investment and IDR 2.5B paid-up capital rule, ensuring that all project expenditures, particularly land, buildings, and machinery, are correctly documented and classified as qualifying assets under BKPM Reg. 5/2025.37 While the OSS system is efficient for initial registration, significant resources must be dedicated to obtaining the critical Izin Lokasi Perairan from KKP, as this validates the project’s spatial compliance at the regional level.23

What to Be Cautious About: The reduction in paid-up capital must not be misinterpreted as a reduced overall financial commitment; the mandatory IDR 10B investment plan remains.36 Extreme caution and intensive due diligence must be applied to land acquisition, especially when dealing with HGB or HGU rights in areas near traditional communities, given the persistent risk of land tenure conflict and regulatory opacity.24

Chapter 4: Project Establishment, Risk Mitigation, and Financial Estimates

4.1 Essential Project Establishment Steps

Successful project establishment begins with meticulous site selection, ensuring access to reliable clean water sources, robust energy supply 44, and strict alignment with government spatial planning. Poor preparation of ponds and land, including inadequate pathogen clearance and waste removal from previous crops, is a common reason for underperformance and increased disease risk.18

Given the IDR 10 Billion minimum investment requirement 36, capital allocation must prioritize high-standard construction techniques—such as plastic pond lining, central drainage systems for waste removal, and high-quality aeration infrastructure—to establish climate-smart operations.18 Post-registration compliance is equally critical. PT PMAs have continuous administrative obligations, including obtaining necessary tax identifications, registering with the national social security system (BPJS), and submitting mandatory quarterly Investment Activity Reports (LKPM) to BKPM.38

4.2 Risk Mitigation Strategies

Biosecurity Protocols and Farm Management

Biosecurity is the single most important factor determining the success of intensive aquaculture, defined as a set of measures designed to prevent the introduction and spread of pathogenic agents.45

1. Prevention: Strict biosecurity measures are the primary defense against catastrophic diseases like White Spot Syndrome Virus (WSSV) and EHP/HPM, the most cited farmer concerns.12 Prevention requires securing pathogen-free certified seed/PL and ensuring stringent management of all water intake and drainage channels.18
2. Early Detection and Intervention: High-intensity systems (RAS/BFT) must be paired with digital infrastructure. IoT sensors and AI platforms provide real-time monitoring and predictive analytics, offering early warnings of potential water quality issues before they escalate into large-scale mortality events.28 Furthermore, emerging management protocols, such as creating controlled thermal gradients to leverage “behavioral fever” in shrimp, show promising potential for mitigating the impact of WSSV outbreaks.13

The effectiveness of any high-tech biosecurity system is highly dependent on human compliance. Given the dominance of small-scale farmers and the documented issues in the informal labor sector—including low profit margins (10%), poor sanitation, and inadequate working conditions 22—the human element presents a critical biosecurity risk vector. Foreign investors must invest heavily in formalized staff training, compliant wages, and adequate living facilities to ensure adherence to international hygiene standards, thereby preventing local practices from compromising the high-tech investment.18

Due Diligence on Local Partners and Concession Arrangement Reliability

Success in Indonesia is often linked to the ability to navigate complex local stakeholder relationships. Critical success factors for large projects include establishing a sound legal basis, securing irrevocable contracts, implementing sensible risk-sharing arrangements, and performing exhaustive due diligence on reliable concession arrangements.46 Foreign investors must commit to comprehensive feasibility studies and market assessments, ensuring the project design is appropriate for the local social and commercial environment.44 The government’s use of the OSS system signifies a general transfer of compliance and operational risk management duties to the private sector.40 This requires robust internal compliance structures and comprehensive insurance to manage systemic challenges like persistent legal uncertainty, environmental shifts, and volatile costs.19

4.3 General Financial Estimates and Profitability Analysis

The financial structure of a high-value aquaculture project is driven by high upfront CAPEX intended to mitigate high operational OPEX and biological risk.

CAPEX Components: Investment costs focus on control and quality.1 Major components include securing long-term land rights (HGB/HGU), constructing lined ponds or tanks, procuring continuous and redundant aeration systems, establishing advanced water intake/effluent treatment infrastructure (critical for biosecurity), and integrating digital monitoring technology (IoT sensors).18

OPEX Benchmarks:

• Feed: Constitutes the largest operational cost, typically ranging from 50% to 70% of total OPEX. Efficient feed utilization (low FCR) is the single most crucial factor for financial sustainability.19
• Power: Electrical consumption in intensive systems (RAS/BFT) is high, accounting for 10% to 25% of operating costs.27
• Labor: Must include budget allocations for compliant wages, benefits, and specialized biosecurity training.22

Table 4.1 provides a comparative overview of profitability expectations for high-value species under different optimized systems:

Table 4.1: Profitability Comparison: Intensive Vannamei vs. Controlled Tilapia

4.4 Expected Profit Margins and Return on Investment (ROI)

The target profit margins for optimized, technologically advanced intensive shrimp farming are aggressive, commencing at 30% or higher per cycle.11 Achieving this depends fundamentally on maintaining a low FCR, consistently high survival rates, and guaranteed access to premium international markets.

However, financial risk is starkly delineated: if a project relies on traditional or semi-intensive methods in high-risk areas, the typical profit margin drops to a precarious 10%. At this low margin, the operation is highly vulnerable to systemic pressures, including annual inflation (2.6%–5.51%), significant price fluctuations (up to 27% volatility), and disease events.22

For Tilapia, the high yields and enhanced feed efficiency provided by BFT systems ensure reliable ROI. The feed cost savings alone can result in significantly higher comparative profits (e.g., IDR 6,300,000 revenue after feed cost in BFT versus IDR 5,100,000 in traditional systems, based on an example price of $\text{Rp}10,000/\text{kg}$ feed).25

4.5 Investment Advice: Financial Planning and Operational Controls

What to Do: Financial planning must budget for high costs associated with premium feed and power but must structure CAPEX investments specifically to reduce long-term OPEX (e.g., investing in RAS/BFT to achieve optimal FCR and water quality).19 The project’s financing structure should leverage the new BKPM regulation, which recognizes tangible assets (land/machinery) toward the investment minimum.37 Given the observed price volatility and production risks 22, integrating a minimum of 25% contingency funding into the total project cost is strongly recommended.

What to Be Cautious About: The most common financial misstep is attempting to run a high-intensity farm using low-cost, inadequate feed or insufficient biosecurity infrastructure. This cost-cutting decision is directly correlated with shifting the operation from the high 30% profit range down to the vulnerable 10% margin, resulting in high risks of failure.11 Effective management of variable costs and ensuring transparent financial oversight are critical for realizing long-term financial sustainability.26

References:

1. Infrastructure Improvement for Shrimp Aquaculture Project: Economic and Financial Analysis – Asian Development Bank,  https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/linked-documents/55020-001-efa.pdf
2. Blue Ambition: Asia Aquaculture Moves into the Future – Asian Insiders,  https://asianinsiders.com/2025/01/14/asia-aquaculture-future/
3. Indonesia: Emerging as a Leader in Aquaculture,  https://www.was.org/articles/Indonesia_Emerging_as_a_Leader_in_Aquaculture.aspx
4. Dutch contribution to more sustainable aquaculture farming in Indonesia,  https://www.larive.com/dutch-contribution-to-more-sustainable-aquaculture-farming-in-indonesia/
5. Article II 2/2025 – TILAPIA: THE NEXT INDONESIAN SEAFOOD RISING STAR – Infofish,  https://v4.infofish.org/index.php/article-ii-2-2025-tilapia-the-next-indonesian-seafood-rising-star
6. Indonesia’s Strong May Push Drives Double-Digit YTD Growth in Shrimp Exports,  https://www.shrimpinsights.com/byte/indonesias-strong-may-push-drives-double-digit-ytd-growth-shrimp-exports
7. Top 6 Seafood Suppliers in Indonesia in Quarter 3 of 2025 – Freshdi,  https://freshdi.com/blog/top-6-seafood-suppliers-in-indonesia-in-quarter-3-of-2025/
8. Indonesia Marine and Fisheries: Tax Strategies for High-Value Investments,  https://www.cekindo.com/blog/indonesia-marine-and-fisheries
9. Indonesia Sustainable Oceans Program – World Bank,  https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/indonesia-sustainable-oceans-program/overview
10. Thailand to chart aquaculture transformation plan at Bangkok workshop,  https://enaca.org/?id=1448
11. Profit Projections and Business Opportunities in Vannamei Shrimp Farming | JALA Blog,  https://jala.tech/blog/cultivation-tips/profit-and-business-opportunities-in-vannamei-shrimp-farming
12. Shrimp Outlook 2025: Indonesian shrimp industry’s performance, challenges, and market dynamics in 2024 – Aqua Culture Asia Pacific,  https://aquaasiapac.com/2025/08/15/shrimp-outlook-2025-indonesian-shrimp-industrys-performance-challenges-and-market-dynamics-in-2024/
13. Strengthening Indonesia’s Shrimp Industry against White Spot Disease in 2025 and Beyond,  https://jala.tech/blog/shrimp-diseases/strengthening-indonesia-s-shrimp-industry-against-white-spot-disease-in-2025-and-beyond
14. Grouper Market Size & Forecast [2033] – Market Growth Reports,  https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/market-reports/grouper-market-113782
15. Biofloc Technology: A Simple, Green Way to Farm Fish and Shrimp,  https://fishvigyan.com/biofloc-technology-a-simple-green-way-to-farm-fish-and-shrimp
16. Where Are the Shrimp Producing Regencies in Indonesia? | JALA Blog,  https://jala.tech/blog/shrimp-industry/shrimp-producing-regencies-indonesia
17. Indonesia: Infrastructure Improvement for Shrimp Aquaculture Project Feasibility Study – Asian Development Bank,  https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/linked-documents/55020-001-ld-05.pdf
18. Investment Guideline for Sustainable Aquaculture in Indonesia,  https://www.idhsustainabletrade.com/uploaded/2018/12/Aquaculture-Summary-4.6-WEB.pdf
19. Floating cage aquaculture production in Indonesia: Assessment of opportunities and challenges in Lake Maninjau – AIMS Press,  http://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/environsci.2022001
20. Five Highly Prospective Indonesian Provinces in 2024 – Business-Indonesia,  https://business-indonesia.org/news/five-highly-prospective-indonesian-provinces-in-2024
21. Competitiveness of and Barriers to Indonesia’s Exports of Ornamental Fish – MDPI,  https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8711
22. Indonesia shrimp fact sheet – ELSAM,  https://elsam.or.id/storage/files/2/Fact-Sheet.pdf
23. 24/PERMEN-KP/2019 – Government Services/Public Administration/Procedures – General Environment – Legal Centric,  https://legalcentric.com/content/view/141585
24. ACTION AGENDA FOR A NEW FOOD AND LAND USE ECONOMY IN INDONESIA FOOD AND LAND USE COALITION INDONESIA DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION JAKA,  https://www.foodandlandusecoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/17th-November-FOLU-Indonesia-Action-Agenda.pdf
25. Enhancing Tilapia Farming Efficiency with the Ariake Kuro Biofloc System,  https://harvestariake.co.id/en/enhancing-tilapia-farming-efficiency-with-the-ariake-kuro-biofloc-system/
26. Sustainability in Intensive Aquaculture—Profitability of Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) Production in Recirculating Aquaculture Systems Based on a Hungarian Case Study – MDPI,  https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/15/7/1055
27. (PDF) Economic Analysis of Red Tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) Production Under Different Solar Energy Alternatives in a Commercial Biofloc System in Colombia – ResearchGate,  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386886392_Economic_Analysis_of_Red_Tilapia_Oreochromis_sp_Production_Under_Different_Solar_Energy_Alternatives_in_a_Commercial_Biofloc_System_in_Colombia
28. Smart Biofloc Systems: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Internet of Things (IoT) for Sustainable Aquaculture Practices – MDPI,  https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/13/7/2204
29. AQUAFEEDS AND FEEDING STRATEGIES IN INDONESIA Iin S. Djunaidah (Continued) – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,  https://www.fao.org/4/v4430e/v4430e06.htm
30. AGRISOCIONOMICS – Ejournal Undip,  https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/agrisocionomics/article/download/17728/10127
31. Penetrating the price barrier of insect protein for animal feed – Feed & Additive Magazine,  https://www.feedandadditive.com/penetrating-the-price-barrier-of-insect-protein-for-animal-feed/
32. Sustainability in Aquaculture Feed: Why Insect Farming Is Not the Answer – FAIRR Initiative,  https://www.fairr.org/news-events/insights/sustainability-in-aquaculture-feed-why-insect-farming-is-not-the-answer
33. Seed quality in aquaculture | CABI Compendium,  https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/cabicompendium.64970
34. Positive Facts Driving Optimism in Indonesia’s Shrimp Industry | JALA Blog,  https://jala.tech/blog/shrimp-industry/positive-facts-driving-optimism-in-indonesia-s-shrimp-industry
35. PT PMA Registration – Lets Move Indonesia,  https://www.letsmoveindonesia.com/pt-pma-registration/
36. Indonesia Lowers Paid-Up Capital for Foreign Investors to IDR 2.5 Billion – ASEAN Briefing,  https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/indonesia-lowers-paid-up-capital-for-foreign-investors-to-idr-2-5-billion/
37. Indonesia Eases Foreign Capital Rules: Key Takeaways from BKPM Regulation No. 5 of 2025 | Withers,  https://www.withersworldwide.com/en-gb/insight/read/indonesia-eases-foreign-capital-rules-key-takeaways-from-bkpm-regulation-no-5-of-2025
38. Online Single Submission (OSS) Indonesia: Key 2025 Changes Explained,  https://ilaglobalconsulting.com/online-single-submission/
39. PT PMA in Indonesia: Obligations After Setup and Common Mistakes,  https://ilaglobalconsulting.com/pt-pma-in-indonesia/
40. Online Single Submission (OSS) System – New Regime of Business Licensing Process in Indonesia | KSP Legal Updates,  https://www.ksplaw.co.id/Publication/KSP-LEGAL-UPDATES/Online-Single-Submission-OSS-System-New-Regime-of-Business-Licensing-Process-in-Indonesia.html
41. The Legal Framework and Government Institutional Landscape of the Fisheries Sector in Indonesia – By PSHK,  https://www.pshk.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Legal-and-Government-Institutional-Landscape-of-the-Fisheries-Sector-Full-Report-PSHK-2019.pdf
42. PT PMA Owns Property in Indonesia? Benefits of Establishing PMA for Company Property Ownership – LMI Consultancy,  https://www.lmiconsultancy.com/pt-pma-owns-property-in-indonesia-benefits-of-establishing-pma-for-company-property-ownership/
43. How to Obtain Tax Incentives for Investments in Indonesia’s Marine and Fisheries Sectors – ASEAN Briefing,  https://www.aseanbriefing.com/doing-business-guide/indonesia/sector-insights/how-to-obtain-tax-incentives-for-investments-in-indonesia-s-marine-and-fisheries-sectors
44. Success factors in aquaculture enterprises in the Pacific farm – FAO Knowledge Repository,  https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/530ea0e9-2ab0-4764-8155-7d99a4fe288d/content
45. Collection and Evaluation of Existing Guidelines and Awareness Materials on Aquaculture Biosecurity for Small-scale Farms in the – WOAH – Asia,  https://rr-asia.woah.org/app/uploads/2021/12/2-collection-and-evaluation-of-existing-guidelines-and-awareness-materials-on-aquaculture-biosecurity-for-small-scal.pdf
46. Critical Success Factors of Water and Power Public–Private Partnerships in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review – MDPI,  https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/6/1603
47. Indonesia Sustainable Oceans Program – World Bank,  https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/indonesia-sustainable-oceans-program/resources